I’ve came across a few discussion with some elderly people and they like the idea of receiving a guarantee paycheck for the rest of their lives but wanted to know how it works.There are many different types of annuity such as deferred annuity, immediate annuity, or even fixed annuity. Today I wanted to briefly touch base with deferred annuity and what it can do for you.
Ex) Let’s say a guy by the name of Jonathan Wilson is 60 years old and he is interested in some form of guaranteed income 10 years from now because he is smart enough to start planning his goals and needs in the near future. He decides to talk to a annuity specialist such as myself and I introduced with a ING annuity which ING calls it Opportunity Plus. He has $300,000 that he can set aside so I break it down for him.
1) As soon as you deposit $300,000, ING will give you a bonus of 5% so Mr. Wilson starts off at $315,000 instead of $300,000.
2) Then for the next 10 years, each year ING will give interest compounding based on the interest of the S&P500 but will guarantee 6% if S&P500 performs less than that.
3) Within the 10th year Mr. Wilson is guarantee at the bare minimum $532,186 (I feel strongly that Mr. Wilson will end up more because S&P500 won’t perform that horribly all 10 years).
4) The start of the 11th year Mr. Wilson will be 71 years old and he wants to start taking guarantee income for himself. He will get 5% annually of whatever cash value is in the annuity. So for instance if it was the worst case scenerio and he ended with $532,186 as his cash value, he will be getting a guarantee income of $21,287 annually (before tax) guaranteed for the rest of his life.
5) Now there are other factors such as if Mr. Wilson was to pass away prior to receiving enough income (more than his principal amount), then there is a death benefit that can go to his beneficiary or he could have set up the annuity where if he passes away his spouse can continue receiving the guaranteed income.
Hope this explain it in a nutshell but it is important to talk with a right annuity specialist (watch out!! Some annuity specialist can be only looking out for themselves and how much commission they can extract) so that they can explain it in more detail and delegate your annuity according to how you want it to be set up.
Showing posts with label ing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ing. Show all posts
Tuesday, August 2, 2011
Saturday, July 30, 2011
How do I get Life Insurance
Once you realize that you do have a need for life insurance the next step is to find a life insurance agent a.k.a financial advisor. The reason I mention that Life insurance agent can also be known as a financial advisor is because there are two types of life insurance: term and permanent.
Term insurance is the death benefit that is covered at a fixed rate for a set period of time (example 10, 20, 30 years) and during that duration if the breadwinner happen to die, then the beneficiary will be receiving a lump sum of money. I’ve mentioned multiple times in my blog that mainstream advisors such as Suze Orman and Dave Ramsey believe that this term insurance is the only vehicle needed.
Permanent insurance is used because the death benefit can covered for the rest of the insureds’ life but more importantly, it’s mainly used because people utilize permanent insurance as a way of building cash value for their long term goals such as kids college tuition, buying house, or even saving for retirement. Personally I am huge believer in permanent insurance, especially Universal Life policy because I understand what this policy will do for my future. Not only do I advise this product but I do own it myself because I don’t believe in advising something I don’t believe. I will have a video soon of introducing my own ING Universal Life policy and I will break it down how my illustration will cater towards my long term goals.
VIDEO COMING OUT SOON!
Labels:
cash value,
financial advisor,
how do i get life insurance,
ing,
kids college tuition,
life insurance,
long term goals,
permanent insurance,
retirement,
suze orman,
term insurance,
universal life
I’m a life insurance agent but I hate life insurance agents
Now don’t get it twisted by hearing this title. This doesn’t mean that I hate myself or that I hate my job. In fact it is quite the opposite. I do very much love my job at ING and I love giving financial advice the right way, but it has been brought to my attention that in this day and age, using a Life Insurance Company to plan out your long term savings/retirement plan can potentially be one of the most effective way to maximize your dollars. Some of the reasons why Life Insurance is so effective is because of the high interest captured in the up market and also the guarantees of not losing in a down market, the tax free withdrawals, liquidity at any time, and the protection for your family. Sounds pretty sweet huh? Then why are insurance companies so frowned upon? Why are these life insurance agents frowned upon?
I’ve read through many different policies from many different clients and they all have one thing in common, GREED! Yes, greed from these so-called life insurance agents who classify themselves as Financial Advisors who don’t have a damn clue towards how the policy they are promoting works. The only thing many of these agents do know is how to set up someone’s policy so that they can extract the most commission off of their clients. I believe it is a mixture of not only the life insurance agents’ fault but also their insurance companies that they represent. They under emphasize the importance of continuous class training for new and veteran agents and the consequences of that is that the clients become the victims of their own financial futures.
Life insurance agents are practicing these unethical behaviors with their clients everyday. An example would be an agent who raises the death benefit much higher than their monthly contribution, which of course increases an agent’s commission. Since this unethical practice happens around the world, people like Dave Ramsey and Suze Orman are able to capitalize their reputation and popularity by simply pointing their fingers and speaking in a loud, stern voice that all permanent life insurance is garbage. I just wanted to point out that there are good agents out there and the best way to distinguish the good from the bad boils down to the agent’s heart and why they are in this business rather than someone who is wearing a salesperson’s cap.
I’ve read through many different policies from many different clients and they all have one thing in common, GREED! Yes, greed from these so-called life insurance agents who classify themselves as Financial Advisors who don’t have a damn clue towards how the policy they are promoting works. The only thing many of these agents do know is how to set up someone’s policy so that they can extract the most commission off of their clients. I believe it is a mixture of not only the life insurance agents’ fault but also their insurance companies that they represent. They under emphasize the importance of continuous class training for new and veteran agents and the consequences of that is that the clients become the victims of their own financial futures.
Life insurance agents are practicing these unethical behaviors with their clients everyday. An example would be an agent who raises the death benefit much higher than their monthly contribution, which of course increases an agent’s commission. Since this unethical practice happens around the world, people like Dave Ramsey and Suze Orman are able to capitalize their reputation and popularity by simply pointing their fingers and speaking in a loud, stern voice that all permanent life insurance is garbage. I just wanted to point out that there are good agents out there and the best way to distinguish the good from the bad boils down to the agent’s heart and why they are in this business rather than someone who is wearing a salesperson’s cap.
Labels:
dave ramsey,
family protection,
financial advice,
good life insurance,
ing,
life insurance,
life insurance agent,
life insurance company,
liquidity,
long term savings,
suze orman,
tax free
Sorry Dave Ramsey but one size doesn’t fit all
Hello, my name is Nick Har and I am an independent financial advisor for ING. After watching this clip from Dave Ramsey and his reason to get only term insurance, it really infuriates me how much a lazy, lethargic person this guy is. It’s amazing how many people listen to this garbage. Can you believe this guy?
His reason for getting only term insurance, he quotes, “let say I’m talking to a 32 year old who has a 4 year and a 2 year old. Let’s visit him 20 years from now, when he’s 20 year level term that I recommend expires. That would make him 52, he would have a 24 year old and a 22 year old. They should, hypothetically, both he out of college, both be grown, gone, out of the picture, no longer a liability.”
How many people out there do you know who are 24 years old, or even lets say 27 years old who are financially independent? Realistically I know quite a bit of people who are still dependent, trying to pursue grad school, and honestly the new trend for people is to stay dependent for a longer period of time..
He also mentions that when he is 52 years he should have about $700k in his 401k if they were to contribute 15% into their 401k!! Are you freaking kidding me! Mutual funds don’t always go up year after year Mr. Ramsey. We have something called recession that occurs every 8 to 10 years.
Dave Ramsey views and financial advice is a one size fits all mentality. What this means is that if you don’t have a 401k at your job, then sorry Dave Ramsey won’t help you out. If you have kids who are still staying at home and they are in their mid 20s then sorry Dave Ramsey won’t help you out. If you don’t have 15 year fixed mortgage then sorry Dave Ramsey won’t help you out! If I want to listen to a financial advisor, I would want someone who can give me advice based on my own personal situation rather than unrealistic hypothetical scenerios.
His reason for getting only term insurance, he quotes, “let say I’m talking to a 32 year old who has a 4 year and a 2 year old. Let’s visit him 20 years from now, when he’s 20 year level term that I recommend expires. That would make him 52, he would have a 24 year old and a 22 year old. They should, hypothetically, both he out of college, both be grown, gone, out of the picture, no longer a liability.”
How many people out there do you know who are 24 years old, or even lets say 27 years old who are financially independent? Realistically I know quite a bit of people who are still dependent, trying to pursue grad school, and honestly the new trend for people is to stay dependent for a longer period of time..
He also mentions that when he is 52 years he should have about $700k in his 401k if they were to contribute 15% into their 401k!! Are you freaking kidding me! Mutual funds don’t always go up year after year Mr. Ramsey. We have something called recession that occurs every 8 to 10 years.
Dave Ramsey views and financial advice is a one size fits all mentality. What this means is that if you don’t have a 401k at your job, then sorry Dave Ramsey won’t help you out. If you have kids who are still staying at home and they are in their mid 20s then sorry Dave Ramsey won’t help you out. If you don’t have 15 year fixed mortgage then sorry Dave Ramsey won’t help you out! If I want to listen to a financial advisor, I would want someone who can give me advice based on my own personal situation rather than unrealistic hypothetical scenerios.
Labels:
401k,
college savings,
dave ramsey,
finance,
financial advice,
financial advisor,
ing,
ira,
life insurance,
mutual funds,
recession,
retirement,
roth ira,
suze orman,
term insurance,
tuition,
youtube
Just because your a great speaker Suze Orman, doesn’t mean your always right…
After watching Suze Orman and her stance on buying only term insurance and investing the difference, my question to her would be to invest in what? For those of you who listen to her religiously, let me ask you something, WHAT SHOULD WE INVEST IN??? WHAT HAVE YOU REALLY LEARNED FROM SUZE?
Well, if we were to focus on long term savings, the most popular types are 401k, 403b, IRA, and according to Suze, we should contribute the maximum in our 401k, 403b when we have extra cash and when we have 3 to 6 months of cash reserve funds. For those of you who are more specific in your financing and understands that one size don’t fit all, please read(listen) carefully.
As you must know, 401k, 403b, IRA plans have the 59 and ½ rule. This means that anytime prior to that age, if you were to withdraw from your vehicle you will have to pay a 10% penalty plus pay taxes on it. Another thing is that 401k, 403, IRA is just the shell and inside of these shells are usually some sort of mutual funds. It is a myth that mutual funds will go up each year and unfortunately in 2008 when housing went through foreclosure, job opportunity were cut, and employees started calling 401k, 201k because some lost 50% of their value, we witnessed that. I took the liberty of showing you a graph of one of the mutual funds below and the problem with our society is that we make decisions based on our emotions.
Solution
Now I don’t want to just leave you with problems, I do want to give you solution and I do want you have the mindset of BE MY OWN BANK. If I can show you long term savings vehicle called Universal Life that Suze Orman despises would that be of interest to you? If I can show you how to 1) capture as much interest when the economy does well and there is no cap 2) if the economy is in recession, there is a guarantee 1% so you never lose 3) LUC (liquidity, use and control) access to your money freely 4) tax free income, would that be of interest to you?
Labels:
401k,
403b,
finance,
financial advisor,
ing,
investment,
life insurance,
mutual fund,
roth ira,
suze orman,
term insurance,
youtube
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)